Imbalanced Dataset

What Is an Imbalanced Dataset?

An imbalanced dataset refers to a situation in which the distribution of data across different classes is not equal. In such datasets, one class, known as the majority class, has significantly more instances than the other class or classes, referred to as the minority class. This imbalance can pose challenges in training machine learning models, as most algorithms assume a relatively balanced distribution of classes to learn effectively. Imbalanced datasets are particularly common in real-world scenarios such as fraud detection, medical diagnosis, and anomaly detection, where the event of interest is rare.

The imbalance in a dataset is often described using a ratio between the number of instances in the majority class and those in the minority class. This ratio is typically expressed in the form of X:Y, where X represents the number of instances in the majority class and Y represents the number of instances in the minority class.

For example:

• A dataset with a ratio of 9:1 indicates that for every 9 instances of the majority class, there is only 1 instance of the minority class.
• A more severe imbalance could be represented as 99:1, where the minority class makes up only 1% of the total dataset.

The higher the ratio, the more imbalanced the dataset, making it more challenging for a model to correctly identify instances of the minority class.

The impact of imbalance varies depending on whether the classification problem is binary or multi-class:

• Binary Classification: In a binary classification problem, the imbalance is typically between two classes — one representing the majority class and the other the minority class. For instance, in a dataset for fraud detection, non-fraudulent transactions (majority class) vastly outnumber fraudulent transactions (minority class). The imbalance in binary classification problems can significantly affect model performance, leading to a bias toward predicting the majority class.
• Multi-Class Classification: In multi-class classification problems, imbalance can occur across several classes, with some classes having significantly fewer instances than others. For example, in an image classification task with 10 different categories, one category may have thousands of labeled images, while another category may have only a few hundred. In such cases, the imbalance is not limited to a single majority-minority relationship but spans across multiple classes, making it harder for models to achieve good performance across all categories.

Why Are Imbalanced Datasets a Problem in Machine Learning?

In machine learning, dealing with imbalanced datasets is a critical challenge that can significantly hinder model performance and reliability. Let’s explore how this imbalance impacts model performance, the pitfalls of common evaluation metrics, and the real-world consequences of ignoring this issue.

Improve your data
quality for better AI

Easily curate and annotate your vision, audio,
and document data with a single platform

Book A Demo

Impact on Model Performance

When a dataset is heavily skewed toward one class, machine learning models tend to become biased towards predicting the majority class. For instance, in a binary classification problem where 95% of the samples belong to Class A and only 5% belong to Class B, a model can achieve high accuracy by simply predicting Class A all the time. However, this behavior renders the model ineffective in identifying the minority class, which is often the class of greater interest.

Imbalanced datasets result in poor performance on minority class predictions, which can be particularly problematic in scenarios where detecting the minority class is crucial. For example, in a fraud detection system, fraudulent transactions represent the minority class. If the model fails to identify these transactions accurately, it could lead to significant financial losses. Similarly, in medical diagnosis, failing to detect a rare disease can have severe consequences for patients.

Metrics Misinterpretation

Accuracy is one of the most commonly used evaluation metrics in machine learning. However, it can be misleading when applied to imbalanced datasets. In the earlier example of a dataset with 95% of samples belonging to Class A, a model that always predicts Class A would achieve 95% accuracy. While this may seem impressive at first glance, the model’s ability to correctly identify the minority class (Class B) is virtually nonexistent.

To properly evaluate models trained on imbalanced datasets, it’s crucial to use metrics that account for the performance on both the majority and minority classes. Metrics like precision, recall, F1-score, and AUC-ROC provide a more comprehensive view.

Real-World Consequences

The impact of imbalanced datasets extends beyond academic exercises into real-world applications with critical consequences:

• Healthcare: In medical diagnostics, imbalanced datasets can result in models that overlook rare but life-threatening conditions. For example, failing to detect cancer in its early stages due to a model’s bias towards non-cancerous cases can lead to delayed treatment and worsened patient outcomes.
• Cybersecurity: In cybersecurity, attacks such as fraud, malware, and phishing attempts often constitute the minority class. An imbalanced model that fails to detect these threats can leave systems vulnerable to breaches and financial losses.
• Finance: In financial services, imbalanced datasets can lead to models that overlook fraudulent transactions or fail to identify customers at risk of defaulting on loans. The inability to accurately detect these minority-class events can result in substantial monetary losses and reputational damage.

Techniques for Handling Imbalanced Datasets

Handling imbalanced datasets is a critical aspect of building reliable machine learning models, particularly when the target variable classes are not equally represented. Various techniques exist to address this challenge, which can be broadly categorized into data-level techniques, algorithm-level techniques, and ensemble methods. Additionally, using the right evaluation metrics is essential to assess the performance of models trained on imbalanced datasets.

Data-Level Techniques

Data-level techniques focus on manipulating the training data to achieve a better balance between the minority and majority classes.

Oversampling

Oversampling techniques increase the number of instances in the minority class to balance the dataset.

• Random Oversampling: This method involves randomly duplicating examples from the minority class until the dataset is balanced. While simple, it can lead to overfitting as the same instances are repeated multiple times.
• SMOTE (Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique): SMOTE generates synthetic samples for the minority class by interpolating between existing instances. This helps create more generalized patterns and reduces overfitting compared to random oversampling.

Undersampling

Undersampling techniques reduce the number of instances in the majority class to balance the dataset.

• Random Undersampling: This method randomly removes instances from the majority class. While effective, it can lead to the loss of valuable information.
• Tomek Links: Tomek links are pairs of instances from different classes that are closest to each other. Removing these pairs can help clean the dataset by eliminating borderline instances.
• NearMiss: NearMiss selects majority class instances that are closest to the minority class instances. It ensures that the retained majority class instances are informative and close to the decision boundary.

Hybrid Methods

Hybrid methods combine oversampling and undersampling to leverage the strengths of both approaches.

• Combining SMOTE with Random Undersampling: One popular hybrid approach is to apply SMOTE to the minority class and then perform random undersampling on the majority class. This helps achieve a balanced dataset without losing too much information.

Algorithm-Level Techniques

Algorithm-level techniques modify the learning algorithms to handle class imbalance more effectively.

Cost-Sensitive Learning

Cost-sensitive learning involves modifying the algorithm to assign higher penalties for misclassifying minority class instances. Many algorithms, such as decision trees and SVMs, can be adjusted to consider different misclassification costs for each class. This makes the model more sensitive to minority class predictions.

Class Balancing in Algorithms

Some algorithms have built-in mechanisms to handle class imbalance. Tree-Based Methods like Random Forest and XGBoost have options to balance class weights. For example, the class_weight parameter in Random Forest can automatically adjust for class imbalance.

Anomaly Detection Methods

Anomaly detection techniques treat the minority class as anomalies or outliers. These methods are particularly useful when the minority class is extremely rare, such as in fraud detection or rare disease diagnosis.

Ensemble Techniques

Ensemble methods combine multiple models to improve predictions on imbalanced datasets.

Balanced Random Forest

Balanced Random Forest modifies the standard Random Forest algorithm by undersampling the majority class in each bootstrap sample. This ensures that each tree in the forest receives a balanced dataset.

EasyEnsemble and BalanceCascade

• EasyEnsemble: EasyEnsemble is an ensemble method that creates multiple balanced subsets of the dataset using random undersampling and trains a separate classifier on each subset. The final predictions are made by aggregating the results from all classifiers.
• BalanceCascade: BalanceCascade builds an ensemble of classifiers by sequentially undersampling the majority class and training a model at each step. Misclassified instances are retained for subsequent models, making the approach dynamic and adaptive.

Using Different Evaluation Metrics

Traditional evaluation metrics like accuracy can be misleading for imbalanced datasets. Instead, the following metrics are more suitable:

• Precision: Precision measures the proportion of correctly predicted positive instances out of all predicted positive instances. It is crucial in applications where false positives are costly.
• Recall: Recall measures the proportion of correctly predicted positive instances out of all actual positive instances. It is essential in applications where false negatives are costly.
• F1-Score: The F1-Score is the harmonic mean of precision and recall, providing a balance between the two metrics.
• AUC-ROC Curve: The Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (AUC-ROC) curve measures the model’s ability to distinguish between classes. A higher AUC indicates better performance.
• PR Curve (Precision-Recall Curve): The PR curve focuses on precision and recall trade-offs, making it more informative for imbalanced datasets.
• Balanced Accuracy: Balanced accuracy is the average of recall obtained on each class. It accounts for class imbalance by giving equal weight to both classes.

By applying a combination of these techniques and evaluation metrics, you can effectively handle imbalanced datasets and build robust machine learning models.

Challenges in Addressing Imbalanced Datasets

Handling imbalanced datasets poses several challenges that can impact the performance and reliability of machine learning models. Here are key issues practitioners often face:

• Overfitting Due to Oversampling: Techniques like oversampling the minority class can lead to overfitting, causing models to memorize patterns specific to the minority class instead of learning generalizable insights. This reduces the model’s ability to perform well on unseen data.
• Loss of Information Due to Undersampling: Undersampling reduces the size of the majority class to balance the dataset, but this comes at the cost of losing valuable information. Important patterns in the majority class may be discarded, negatively impacting the model’s overall accuracy.
• Synthetic Data Issues: Synthetic data generation methods like SMOTE (Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique) create new samples to address imbalance. However, these synthetic samples can sometimes be unrealistic or introduce noise, leading to a less reliable model.
• Computational Costs: Addressing imbalance often requires additional computational resources. Techniques such as resampling or generating synthetic data increase training time and computational complexity, making the process more expensive and time-consuming.
• Domain-Specific Challenges: Determining what constitutes a “rare” class can vary significantly across domains. Domain expertise is crucial to define class imbalances accurately and ensure the chosen approach aligns with the real-world problem.
• Choosing the Right Technique: Selecting the appropriate method to handle imbalance can be difficult. The effectiveness of oversampling, undersampling, or using synthetic data depends on the dataset, problem type, and domain, requiring careful experimentation and validation.

Improve your data
quality for better AI

Easily curate and annotate your vision, audio,
and document data with a single platform

Book A Demo